At a CNN town hall on Tuesday, President Joe Biden dismissed progressive Democratic plans to cancel $50,000 in student college debt — at a cost of some $1 trillion — although he indicated support for $10,000 in loan forgiveness. Biden said he would rather spend some of the difference on early childhood education than forgiving “the debt, billions of dollars of debt, for people who have gone to Harvard and Yale and Penn.”
Many on the left are unhappy with Biden’s decision. “Nowhere does it say we must trade-off early childhood education for student loan forgiveness,” said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). “We can have both.” AOC’s response reflects a new consensus among many Democratic politicians and pundits — not to mention lefty econ Twitter — that Washington doesn’t really have to worry much about what things cost. With interest rates and inflation low, Washington has plenty of room to spend, spend, spend. Indeed, Biden also spouts that view when talking about his $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief plan. “Now is the time we should be spending,” he also said at the town hall. “Now is the time to go big.” …
… But what if that benign fiscal situation turns hostile? What if today’s placid macroeconomic reality becomes far more volatile and unpredictable? It’s not a crazy notion. Policymakers shouldn’t assume the good times will never end when they’re making taxing and spending decisions. They should avoid huge fiscal wagers that the future will be much the same as the recent past.
One plausible scenario for a big change in America’s economic climate — as well as those in other rich economies — is laid out in the 2020 book The Great Demographic Reversal: Aging Societies, Waning Inequality, and an Inflation Revival. Economists Charles Goodhart and Manoj Pradhan make the case that the current macroeconomic situation of persistently low interest rates and low inflation was created by a particular set of historical economic circumstances.