In general the House tax plan is consistent with sound economic reasoning on tax policy—flattening and lowering personal rates and eliminating the AMT are important and long overdue. The 50% exclusion on investment income—capital gains, interest, and dividends—will help to ameliorate, although not eliminate, the income tax’s bias against saving and investment. On the business tax side the two most important changes are the reduction of the corporate tax to 20% and, maybe even more importantly, abolishing the system of depreciation and instituting expensing for all business purchases. My only quarrel with the plan is the border adjustment tax. From my understanding of the tax it actually violates a basic principle of taxation, namely that the cost of all inputs into a production process, whether the inputs are produced here or imported and whether the product being produced is for home use or export, should be deductible from the taxable income that it is generating. I tend to agree with the analysis put forth by the Mercatus Center and Steve Forbes on this subject.
A (very) brief comment on the US House Tax Plan
by Roy Cordato
March 1, 2017 at 3:12 pm
Roy Cordato / Senior Economist and Resident Scholar
Roy Cordato is Senior Economist and Resident Scholar at the John Locke Foundation. From January 2001 to March 2017, he held the position of Vice President for Research at the ...
Jon Sanders, July 19, 2019
Brenee Goforth, July 19, 2019
Sam Hieb, July 19, 2019
Subscribe to periodic updates from the Locker Room with the latest news on North Carolina issues: