Guy Benson uses his latest TownHall.com column to recount the latest developments in the scandals surrounding Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
As Donald Trump readies his anti-Clinton barrage on Monday, he has plenty of fresh material to work with. Hillary famously claimed that her bootleg, unsecure email server contained “no classified material.” This was comprehensively false. Thousands of classified emails passed through her improper server — including more than 100 she personally sent herself, and dozens that contained information at secret, top secret, and ‘beyond top secret’ levels. Intelligence experts this week told the Associated Press that some of these messages could have compromised the identities of CIA assets, and now the Wall Street Journal reports that at least some of her emails pertained to planned US drone strikes in Pakistan. …
… Clinton knew that her emails involved discussions of Iranian nuclear negotiations, drone strikes in sensitive regions, and North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, yet she asserted that nothing classified had ever passed through her unsecure, improper email system — to which our enemies almost certainly had access. Meanwhile, … we told you about the newly-relevant ‘Clinton University’ racket, in which Bill Clinton was paid a fortune to be the face of an online school (that has faced fraud accusations), which just so happened to enjoy a dramatic spike in large government grants — including from his wife’s State Department — as he was lining his pockets. …
… Hillary Clinton appears to have effectively sold a seat on a key advisory board on extremely sensitive matters to a man with virtually no qualifications other than having donated piles of money to her family slush fund and to Democrats. When this embarrassment got flagged, her staff stonewalled, stalled, then finally forced the guy to resign. Crooked. Hillary. To be sure, Trump faces new troubles of his own seemingly every day — and Clinton’s central attack that he’s temperamentally unfit to the president may be hitting home. But details about her own dealings and conduct consistently illustrate why she is ethically unfit to occupy the Oval Office.
