Deroy Murdock‘s latest column notes the irony of President Obama’s sympathetic words for the Occupy Wall Street protesters, whose targets include the people who bankroll Obama’s election campaigns.

Wall Street’s money never has been too dirty for Obama’s campaigns, his derision notwithstanding.

For his 2008 presidential bid, donors in the Securities and Investment industry were Obama’s No. 4 source of campaign loot, just behind Education. Wall Street, broadly defined, poured $15,798,904 into Obama’s treasure chest. Overall, contributors in the Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate sector pumped $42,047,073 into Obama’s quest for hope and change. Tose top contributors included those at Obamas No. 2 campaign spigot, Goldman Sachs? ($1,013,091). Other leading donors included staffers at JPMorgan Chase ($808,799), Citigroup ($736,771), UBS ($532, 674), and Morgan Stanley? ($512,232).

Even for Obama’s 2004 U.S. Senate race, the Securities and Investment industrys PACs furnished $61,500. Individuals wrote checks for $1,490,697. Total: $1,552,197.

Nevertheless, Obama still denounced his own financial supporters last April 10 as people “who will take whatever you can get, however you can get it.”

If Wall Street really is so disgusting, Obama easily can purify himself of this supposed infection: Return all this money and reject further funds from financiers. If Wall Street and its denizens really are as repulsive as Obama insists, he eagerly should refund their nasty money and refuse any more of it.

If Barack H. Obama fails to do this, Americans should conclude that the H does not stand for Hussein. It means Hypocrite.