This article posted by Reason is a hillarious book review of Michael Otsuka?s Libertarianism Without Inequality. The book attempts — unsuccessfully — to redefine what libertarian means by adding a qualifier. Instead of the basic philosophical term created as a tribute to John Locke, Otsuka believes that present day thinkers have missed another side of Locke, his left-leaning side.

This is perhaps the best quote from the article:

Otsuka complains that ?even many of Locke?s more moderate or left-leaning interpreters have not yet provided a sufficiently egalitarian reconstruction of his political philosophy.? In other words, Locke wouldn?t agree with Otsuka, but once Otsuka has ?cleansed? Locke?s ideas and made them ?sufficiently egalitarian,? Otsuka can call himself a Lockean.