Scientists who forget to employ the scientific method

Yale computer science professor David Gelernter devotes a new Commentary magazine cover story to what he calls the “closing of the scientific mind.” Among the most interesting points is Gelernter’s discussion of scientists’ unwillingness to accept dissenting views in certain areas.

That science should face crises in the early 21st century is inevitable. Power corrupts, and science today is the Catholic Church around the start of the 16th century: used to having its own way and dealing with heretics by excommunication, not argument.

Science is caught up, also, in the same educational breakdown that has brought so many other proud fields low. Science needs reasoned argument and constant skepticism and open-mindedness. But our leading universities have dedicated themselves to stamping them out—at least in all political areas. We routinely provide superb technical educations in science, mathematics, and technology to brilliant undergraduates and doctoral students. But if those same students have been taught since kindergarten that you are not permitted to question the doctrine of man-made global warming, or the line that men and women are interchangeable, or the multiculturalist idea that all cultures and nations are equally good (except for Western nations and cultures, which are worse), how will they ever become reasonable, skeptical scientists? They’ve been reared on the idea that questioning official doctrine is wrong, gauche, just unacceptable in polite society. (And if you are president of Harvard, it can get you fired.)

Anyone who has followed the arguments of global warming alarmists will recognize the truth in Gelernter’s statements.

No comments yet. You should be kind and add one!

Our apologies, you must be registered and logged in to post a comment.