NEA: NC is 42nd (not 49th) in per pupil spending
I have spent months countering the “49th in the nation myth,” a talking point manufactured by public school advocacy groups to attack the budget approved by the NC General Assembly last year. At long last, the National Education Association (NEA) has released Rankings of the States 2011 and Estimates of School Statistics 2012, which should set the record straight.
According to the NEA study, North Carolina ranked 42nd in per pupil expenditure for the current (2011-2012) school year (see table below).
Interestingly, North Carolina’s 2011-2012 ranking (42nd) is higher than the state’s NEA rankings for the 2010-2011 (45th) and 2009-2010 (43rd) school years. (See Rankings 2011 and Estimates 2012, pp. 54-55, 67)
For intellectually honest progressives, the latest NEA study should settle the question of where North Carolina ranks in per pupil spending. However, I suspect that the myth will continue to be cited by Democrats and their enablers.
| Jurisdiction |
Per pupil expenditures |
Rank |
| New York |
$18,616 |
1 |
| Vermont |
$18,571 |
2 |
| New Jersey |
$18,486 |
3 |
| Alaska |
$17,540 |
4 |
| Rhode Island |
$16,683 |
5 |
| Wyoming |
$16,666 |
6 |
| Maryland |
$15,978 |
7 |
| Maine |
$15,836 |
8 |
| Connecticut |
$15,514 |
9 |
| Massachusetts |
$15,213 |
10 |
| New Hampshire |
$14,587 |
11 |
| Delaware |
$14,396 |
12 |
| District of Columbia |
$13,952 |
13 |
| Pennsylvania |
$13,904 |
14 |
| Arkansas |
$12,779 |
15 |
| Michigan |
$12,457 |
16 |
| Minnesota |
$12,377 |
17 |
| Illinois |
$12,368 |
18 |
| Wisconsin |
$12,178 |
19 |
| Hawaii |
$11,921 |
20 |
| West Virginia |
$11,748 |
21 |
| Indiana |
$11,577 |
22 |
| Virginia |
$11,192 |
23 |
| New Mexico |
$11,118 |
24 |
| Oregon |
$10,897 |
25 |
| Nebraska |
$10,877 |
26 |
| Montana |
$10,309 |
27 |
| Georgia |
$10,112 |
28 |
| Washington |
$10,098 |
29 |
| Louisiana |
$9,998 |
30 |
| Ohio |
$9,888 |
31 |
| Missouri |
$9,760 |
32 |
| Colorado |
$9,676 |
33 |
| Kentucky |
$9,636 |
34 |
| California |
$9,541 |
35 |
| Kansas |
$9,518 |
36 |
| Iowa |
$9,462 |
37 |
| South Carolina |
$9,260 |
38 |
| South Dakota |
$9,214 |
39 |
| North Dakota |
$9,169 |
40 |
| Mississippi |
$9,060 |
41 |
| North Carolina |
$8,565 |
42 |
| Tennessee |
$8,464 |
43 |
| Alabama |
$8,405 |
44 |
| Idaho |
$8,323 |
45 |
| Oklahoma |
$8,306 |
46 |
| Texas |
$8,265 |
47 |
| Nevada |
$8,247 |
48 |
| Florida |
$8,180 |
49 |
| Utah |
$6,849 |
50 |
| Arizona |
$6,683 |
51 |
(Source: National Education Association, “Rankings of the States 2011 and Estimates of School Statistics 2012,” December 2011, http://www.nea.org/home/32073.htm, p. 67. Note: I use the “fall enrollment” PPE figures, as recommended by NEA researchers.)

2 comments
Why in the world would anyone boast that NC is 42nd and not 49th…this is still a horrible position! This organization should be ashamed of themselves for even posting these numbers – “OH YAY We are 42nd and not 49th!” DISGUSTING! NC is still at the bottom of the barrel! Makes me sick that an organization is boasting these dismal numbers!
I have to agree with kristinaelanie…why would NC boast about ranking 42nd and not 49th? We’re still in the bottom 10! You’ve got to be kidding me! Even West Virginia and Mississippi, historically well-known poor states, rank higher than we do! If anything, legislators should be ashamed of this ranking! As an NC teacher, I am!
Our apologies, you must be registered and logged in to post a comment.